Skip to content

Proof & methodology

Show me the math.

WERISCO is new. So instead of logos and testimonials we can't back up, this page shows you exactly how every number on this site is produced, and invites you to test it on your own data.

What you'll find here
  • Cost calculations with every formula
  • Product demonstrations you can click
  • Illustrative scenarios, labeled
  • Our exposure and accuracy methodology
  • Benchmarks with named sources
What we will never do
  • Invent customers, logos or testimonials
  • Present a simulation as a result
  • Claim certifications we don't hold
  • Present a file export as a live connection
  • Hide the formula behind a number
Illustrative example

The homepage example, line by line.

Annual supply-chain leakage$ thousands
Illustrative example, not a customer result
  1. a
    Stockouts
    Lost margin, penalties and recovery on orders that couldn't ship
    = stockout cost, per year
    82
  2. b
    Excess inventory
    Carrying cost on stock above target cover
    = $8.0M × 6% excess × 20% carrying
    96
  3. c
    Expedite freight
    Premium transport to recover late supply
    = expedite invoices, per year
    36
Σ
Illustrative annual leakage
$214K

Illustrative example for a $60M manufacturer with $8M of inventory. Not a customer result. Every input and rate is editable in the calculator.

Run it with your numbers
Bridge$K
54
107
161
214
Stockouts
Excess
Expedite
Total

Methodology · exposure

How an exception gets its $ number.

Exposure is an estimate, not a forecast of certainty. Every component is traceable to records in your data.

AMargin at risk
Σ (open order value × gross margin %) for orders the exception reaches before recovery
BPenalties
Contractual service fines on affected customer orders (from your terms)
CRecovery cost
Expedite freight + overtime + spot-buy premium, from your historical rates
DCarrying cost
Excess value × carrying rate × days held ÷ 365
ExposureA + B + C (+ D where stock is held)

Data & forecast methodology

Measured against baselines, not adjectives.

01

Data quality first

Every record is mapped to one model. Unit mismatches, impossible values and duplicates are quarantined with a reason, never silently used.

02

Forecast accuracy

Per-SKU models are back-tested on a hold-out window at the planning horizon and reported as wMAPE, bias and skill versus naïve and seasonal-naïve forecasts.

03

Recommendations

Options are compared on cost, time and residual risk. Your team approves. Estimate and outcome are both logged so accuracy of the recommendations themselves is measurable.

Benchmarks with sources

Why this matters, from the research.

3.7 years

Survey respondents reported material supply-chain disruptions lasting a month or longer every 3.7 years on average.

Source: McKinsey Global Institute, “Risk, resilience, and rebalancing in global value chains”, August 2020
Rules of thumb we label as such

Carrying cost rates in the cost calculator are planning assumptions, not benchmarks. They are editable on the page. The audit does not estimate savings.

Product demonstration

The method is in the product.

Risk Impact in the real product: every exposure line shows its formula and record count. Risks that can't be quantified from your data are labeled, never guessed.

A container terminal at night

Supply chain audit

The only proof that matters is your data.

A 20-minute call and two file exports: stock by item and open orders. You see the inventory and order value exposed. No integration, no savings estimate, and an NDA if you need one.